High-dimensional analysis of 16 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine combinations reveals lymphocyte signatures correlating with immunogenicity.

The range of vaccines developed against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS­CoV­2) provides a unique opportunity to study immunization across different platforms. In a single-center cohort, we analyzed the humoral and cellular immune compartments following five coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines spanning three technologies (adenoviral, mRNA and inactivated virus) administered in 16 combinations. For adenoviral and inactivated-virus vaccines, heterologous combinations were generally more immunogenic compared to homologous regimens. The mRNA vaccine as the second dose resulted in the strongest antibody response and induced the highest frequency of spike-binding memory B cells irrespective of the priming vaccine. Priming with the inactivated-virus vaccine increased the SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response, whereas boosting did not. Distinct immune signatures were elicited by the different vaccine combinations, demonstrating that the immune response is shaped by the type of vaccines applied and the order in which they are delivered. These data provide a framework for improving future vaccine strategies against pathogens and cancer.

Receptor-binding domain-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine adjuvanted with cyclic di-adenosine monophosphate enhances humoral and cellular immunity in mice.

Novel adjuvants are highly desired to improve immune responses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. This work reports the potential of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonist adjuvant, the cyclic di-adenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP), in a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine based on the receptor binding domain (RBD). Here, mice immunized with two doses of monomeric RBD adjuvanted with c-di-AMP intramuscularly were found to exhibit stronger immune responses compared to mice vaccinated with RBD adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)3 ) or without adjuvant. After two immunizations, consistent enhancements in the magnitude of RBD-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody response were observed by RBD + c-di-AMP (mean: 15360) compared to RBD + Al(OH)3 (mean: 3280) and RBD alone (n.d.). Analysis of IgG subtypes indicated a predominantly Th1-biased immune response (IgG2c, mean: 14480; IgG2b, mean: 1040, IgG1, mean: 470) in mice vaccinated with RBD + c-di-AMP compared to a Th2-biased response in those vaccinated with RBD + Al(OH)3 (IgG2c, mean: 60; IgG2b: n.d.; IgG1, mean: 16660). In addition, the RBD + c-di-AMP group showed better neutralizing antibody responses as determined by pseudovirus neutralization assay and by plaque reduction neutralization assay with SARS-CoV-2 wild type. Moreover, the RBD + c-di-AMP vaccine promoted interferon-γ secretion of spleen cell cultures after RBD stimulation. Furthermore, evaluation of IgG-antibody titers in aged mice showed that di-AMP was able to improve RBD-immunogenicity at old age after 3 doses (mean: 4000). These data suggest that c-di-AMP improves immune responses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine based on RBD, and would be considered a promising option for future COVID-19 vaccines.

Neutralizing response elicited by homologous and heterologous prime booster vaccination against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 B.1, P.1, C.37 and B.1.617.2 variants.

Heterologous Covid-19 vaccination strategies arose due to interruption of vaccination programs plus delay and shortage of vaccine supplies. We analysed neutralizing response against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 B.1 and P.1, C.37 and B.1.67.2 variants elicited by 16 homologous and heterologous protocols combining Gam-COVID-Vac, ChAdOx1-S, Ad5-nCorV, BBIBP-CorV and mRNA-1273 vaccines. Homologous mRNA-1273 and heterologous schemes of a non-replicative viral vector/inactivated virus-based vaccine combined with mRNA-1273 induced significantly broader and greater neutralizing antibody-response. Moreover, serum from participants vaccinated with combinations of ChAdOx1-S/Ad5-nCorV and BBIBP-CorV/non-replicative viral vector-based vaccines showed higher or equivalent neutralizing response compared to homologous protocols, pointing them as good alternative platforms. BBIBP-CorV used as second dose exhibited significantly lower neutralizing response compared to other protocols, demonstrating that it should not be recommended as second dose. The information provided herein is valuable to redesign vaccination strategies, especially for low-income countries that still struggle with low percentages of immunized populations and vaccine supply shortage.

Evaluation of the Gam-COVID-Vac and vaccine-induced neutralizing response against SARS-CoV-2 lineage P.1 variant in an Argentinean cohort.

We evaluated humoral immune-response elicited by Sputnik-V by measuring anti-Spike (S) IgG antibodies (Abs) and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) prior to, 14 and 42 days after-vaccination. The safety and disease rates among vaccinated individuals were also evaluated. Since SARS-CoV-2 lineage P.1 is rapidly spreading in Argentina, virus-neutralizing activity of Sputnik-V-elicited and infection-elicited NAb faced to P.1 were also assessed. A total of 285 participants were recruited; all reported good tolerance, without any severe adverse event. Nine COVID-19 cases were confirmed in fully vaccinated individuals and viable P.1 variant was successfully isolated from one of them. At day 42, 99.65% of the individuals had anti-S IgG; however, 23.15% had not detectable NAbs. Significantly higher neutralization potency against WT compared to P.1 (p < 0·001) was observed. Some samples failed to neutralize P.1, mainly among vaccinated-naїve subjects; however, no significant differences were observed among previously infected-vaccinated individuals. Our results corroborated that Sputnik-V is safe and induces an efficient humoral immune response, although not all immunized subjects develop Nabs. Herein, we show for the first time, evidence of infectious SARS-CoV-2 shedding from Sputnik-V fully vaccinated individuals, by the isolation of viable virus from the nasopharyngeal swab of one participant of our study, 139 days after receiving the second dose. Thereby, we provide evidence indicating that the vaccine might avoid severe forms of COVID-19 but does not prevent infection nor prevents transmission from a fully vaccinated individual.

The extent of infectious SARS-CoV-2 shedding in an Argentinean cohort.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the infectious extent of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) in different settings where prevention strategies are critical to limit infection spread, we evaluated SARS-COV-2 viability to guide public health policies regarding isolation criteria and infection control. METHODS: We attempted viral isolation in 82 nasopharyngeal swabs from 72 patients with confirmed SARS-COV-2 infection. Study population was divided into four groups: (i) Patients during the first week of symptoms; (ii) Patients with prolonged positive PCR; (iii) Healthcare workers from a hospital participating of an outbreak investigation, with SARS-COV-2 infection confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and (iv) Recipients of convalescent immune plasma (CIP).Vero Cl76 cell-line (ATCC CRL-587) was used in assays for virus isolation. Plasma samples of CIP recipients were also tested with plaque-reduction neutralization test. RESULTS: We obtained infectious SARS-COV-2 isolates from 15/84 nasopharyngeal swabs. The virus could not be isolated from upper respiratory tract samples collected 10-day after onset of symptoms (AOS) in patients with mild-moderate disease. CONCLUSION: The knowledge of the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity AOS is relevant for effective prevention measures. This allows to discuss criteria for end isolation despite persistence of positive PCR and improve timing for hospital discharge with consequent availability of critical beds.